US State-to-State Business Travel Compliance and Risks

International Services | Fernando R. Lopez | Oct 15, 2019

While organisations often overlook tax-compliance requirements related to business travel, the days of simply traveling to and working in a different state or country for business without a thought to tax liabilities are coming to an end. Looking for additional tax revenue, US state taxing authorities are becoming stricter and more vigilant in monitoring business travel.

Extensive time spent on business travel in a country outside the US, or even a different state within the US, could create a PE exposure for the employing entity.

All US states have different reporting, withholding, and filing obligations for individuals performing services. The compliance obligations vary for the employer and the employees. Penalties and interest for non­compliance vary by state. Internationally, immigration and tax offices have started to exchange information on travellers for increased compliance.

Bottom line, to avoid tax­-compliance risks, employees and employers must become compliant with their payroll withholding, reporting, and filing obligations. Some simple dos and don’ts might include:

  • Differentiate between what is tax liable and what is not. If individuals are traveling for a conference, the risks are probably low. But risks might increase if individuals in a jurisdiction are developing business or signing contracts.
  • Document clear guidelines and policies. For instance, create a risk-tolerance threshold on number of days where the company would start reporting/withholding.
  • Keep in mind country-specific and state-specific regulations.
  • Evaluate the possibility of tracking all business travel via a central team.
  • Look internally or externally for technical solutions to track and monitor all business travel.
  • Because clear and documented data is the best defence if a tax authority comes calling, centralised teams and technology will help in maintaining information.

And finally, like any other change in the organization, treat this as just that, a change.

2021-08-20T11:10:57-04:00

カリフォルニア州 Water’s-Edge Election 制度廃止の行方 ― AB1790の最新動向 ― The Future of Californiaʼs Waterʼs-Edge Election ―An Update on AB 1790―

カリフォルニア州で提案されている法案AB 1790は、長年続いている「ウォーターズ・エッジ選択(Water's-Edge Election)」を廃止する可能性があるだろうか。Could California's proposed AB 1790 eliminate the long-standing Water's-Edge Election?

Read More »